LIVE
ANTHROPICOpus 4.7 benchmarks published2m ago
CLAUDEOK142ms
OPUS 4.7$15 / $75per Mtok
CHATGPTOK89ms
HACKERNEWSWhy has not AI improved design quality the way it improved dev speed?14m ago
MMLU-PROleader Opus 4.788.4
GEMINIDEGRADED312ms
MISTRALMistral Medium 3 released6m ago
GPT-4o$5 / $15per Mtok
ARXIVCompositional reasoning in LRMs22m ago
BEDROCKOK178ms
GEMINI 2.5$3.50 / $10.50per Mtok
THE VERGEFrontier Model Forum expansion announced38m ago
SWE-BENCHleader Claude Opus 4.772.1%
MISTRALOK104ms
ANTHROPICOpus 4.7 benchmarks published2m ago
CLAUDEOK142ms
OPUS 4.7$15 / $75per Mtok
CHATGPTOK89ms
HACKERNEWSWhy has not AI improved design quality the way it improved dev speed?14m ago
MMLU-PROleader Opus 4.788.4
GEMINIDEGRADED312ms
MISTRALMistral Medium 3 released6m ago
GPT-4o$5 / $15per Mtok
ARXIVCompositional reasoning in LRMs22m ago
BEDROCKOK178ms
GEMINI 2.5$3.50 / $10.50per Mtok
THE VERGEFrontier Model Forum expansion announced38m ago
SWE-BENCHleader Claude Opus 4.772.1%
MISTRALOK104ms

Claude Opus 4.7 vs Gemini 2.5 Pro

Claude Opus 4.7 and Gemini 2.5 Pro are the two strongest reasoning models in 2026, and as of April 17 they are both 1 million token context models. Claude leads on code generation, SWE-bench, and reasoning benchmarks, while Gemini still wins hard on price. The choice now comes down to raw accuracy versus cost, not context capacity.

Head-to-Head Specs

SpecClaude Opus 4.7Gemini 2.5 Pro
ProviderAnthropicGoogle
Input Price$15.00/1M$1.25/1M
Output Price$75.00/1M$10.00/1M
Context Window1M1M
Released2026-042025-03
Capabilitiestext, vision, tool-use, codetext, vision, tool-use, code, reasoning

Benchmark Scores

BenchmarkClaude Opus 4.7Gemini 2.5 ProWinner
MMLU-Pro93.891.2Claude
HumanEval96.293.8Claude
GPQA Diamond76.571.9Claude
MATH93.190.5Claude
SWE-bench65.459.4Claude

See the full benchmark leaderboard for all models.

Category Breakdown

Code generationClaude Opus 4.7

Claude scores 96.2 on HumanEval vs Gemini at 93.8

ReasoningClaude Opus 4.7

Claude leads on GPQA Diamond (76.5 vs 71.9)

Context windowTieTie

Both models now support 1M token context windows

PricingGemini 2.5 Pro

Gemini costs $1.25/$10 vs Claude at $15/$75 per 1M tokens

MathClaude Opus 4.7

Claude scores 93.1 on MATH vs Gemini at 90.5

SWE-benchClaude Opus 4.7

Claude leads real-world engineering tasks (65.4 vs 59.4)

Choose Claude Opus 4.7 when:

  • Highest-quality code generation
  • Complex multi-step reasoning tasks
  • Agentic tool use workflows
  • Tasks where accuracy matters more than cost
View Claude Opus 4.7 details

Choose Gemini 2.5 Pro when:

  • Cost-sensitive production workloads
  • Video and large multimodal inputs
  • Google Cloud ecosystem integration
  • Teams processing massive volumes cheaply
View Gemini 2.5 Pro details

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is better, Claude Opus 4.7 or Gemini 2.5 Pro?

It depends on your use case. Claude Opus 4.7 from Anthropic excels at highest-quality code generation, while Gemini 2.5 Pro from Google is better for cost-sensitive production workloads. See the full comparison above for detailed benchmarks and pricing.

How much does Claude Opus 4.7 cost compared to Gemini 2.5 Pro?

Claude Opus 4.7 costs $15.00 input and $75.00 output per 1M tokens. Gemini 2.5 Pro costs $1.25 input and $10.00 output per 1M tokens.

What is the context window difference between Claude Opus 4.7 and Gemini 2.5 Pro?

Claude Opus 4.7 supports 1M tokens, while Gemini 2.5 Pro supports 1M tokens.

More Comparisons

Interactive Compare ToolAll ModelsFull Pricing Guide