Claude Opus 4.7 vs Llama 4 Maverick
This comparison captures the central tension in AI today: proprietary vs open source. Claude Opus 4.7 is the best closed-source model by most benchmarks and now ships with a 1M context window, while Llama 4 Maverick is Meta's strongest open-source offering, also at 1M context. Claude wins on raw performance, but Llama is free to self-host and fine-tune. The right choice depends entirely on your deployment constraints.
Head-to-Head Specs
| Spec | Claude Opus 4.7 | Llama 4 Maverick |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Anthropic | Meta |
| Input Price | $15.00/1M | Free/1M |
| Output Price | $75.00/1M | Free/1M |
| Context Window | 1M | 1M |
| Released | 2026-04 | 2025-04 |
| Capabilities | text, vision, tool-use, code | text, vision, code |
Benchmark Scores
| Benchmark | Claude Opus 4.7 | Llama 4 Maverick | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| MMLU-Pro | 93.8 | 89.3 | Claude |
| HumanEval | 96.2 | 91.7 | Claude |
| GPQA Diamond | 76.5 | 64.1 | Claude |
| MATH | 93.1 | 86.7 | Claude |
| SWE-bench | 65.4 | 52.8 | Claude |
See the full benchmark leaderboard for all models.
Category Breakdown
Claude leads across all five major benchmarks
Llama is free to self-host; Claude costs $15/$75 per 1M tokens
Llama can be fine-tuned for specific domains; Claude cannot
Both models offer 1M token context windows
Claude scores 96.2 on HumanEval vs Maverick at 91.7
Self-hosted Llama keeps all data on your infrastructure
Choose Claude Opus 4.7 when:
- ▸Best possible output quality regardless of cost
- ▸Quick API integration without infrastructure
- ▸Agentic workflows needing tool use
- ▸Teams without ML infrastructure expertise
Choose Llama 4 Maverick when:
- ▸On-premise deployments for data sovereignty
- ▸Custom fine-tuning for specific domains
- ▸Zero marginal cost at high volume
- ▸Research and experimentation
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is better, Claude Opus 4.7 or Llama 4 Maverick?
It depends on your use case. Claude Opus 4.7 from Anthropic excels at best possible output quality regardless of cost, while Llama 4 Maverick from Meta is better for on-premise deployments for data sovereignty. See the full comparison above for detailed benchmarks and pricing.
How much does Claude Opus 4.7 cost compared to Llama 4 Maverick?
Claude Opus 4.7 costs $15.00 input and $75.00 output per 1M tokens. Llama 4 Maverick costs Free input and Free output per 1M tokens.
What is the context window difference between Claude Opus 4.7 and Llama 4 Maverick?
Claude Opus 4.7 supports 1M tokens, while Llama 4 Maverick supports 1M tokens.